God's Existence Disproven

What is theology? Who is God? why do some view conclude that a God make its? Saint doubting Thomas doubting Thomas goes from the circumstance that thither must be a early cost-effective originator to the conclusion that God is that condition. Why must Aquinas depict the extraordinary jump from on that point cosmos a engender, to assuming that this creator must be God? Would it not be just as thinkable to make matter the rootage cause? Matter is the northward that some(prenominal) physical object is composed of. Matter is uncongenial and finite, with no beginning or end. The best explanation to the man of God, is that God does not exist as a outset expeditious cause.         The argument for God, as presented by Aquinas, is to show that the existence of the world and everything in it can only be explained if on that point is a God who is the initial cause. The argument states that it is impossible for any being to be the efficient caus e of itself because then it would eat up to bring itself into being, and to bring itself into being, it would have to exist before it existed. If a being exists, it is because some being prior to it, was its cause. Therefore, if no first cause exists, neither will any other being exist. Therefore, there is a first efficient cause--God.

        This argument suck ups that a first cause is needed to explain the existence of anything. Aquinas also assumes this first cause to be God. How can anyone rationally conclude that there is a God from the simple bid that a first cause is necessary? Therefor e, a first cause does not prove God, it only! assumes that there is a God, at best. Could one not put matter in the place of God in Aquinas argument and still assume there... If you trust to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay